Grant reporting
Grant reporting software that is not a second year of work.
Grant reporting software should come from the file you already keep. Grantis stores the documents and generates funder-specific reports from the same grant record.
The stall
Export, retype, format, hope the totals match.
The board packet is a second year of work when the report is downstream of a system that never held the whole file.
Grant reporting software often means that rebuild. Outcomes live in one sheet. Scores live in a form. Dates live in an inbox. Someone spends the week before the meeting making those three agree.
If the shape of the packet changes, the year gets rebuilt again. That is a template problem wearing a data problem’s clothes.
The hold
Grant reporting software comes from the file you already keep.
The Document and Reporting Hub in Grantis is storage plus generation. Award documents, compliance documentation, and funder-specific reports sit with the grant. The outcomes, scores, and dates already on the record are what the report can speak to.
The Foundation Operations Health Score includes reporting timeliness. If packets are always late, that should show up as an operational fact, not as a feeling in the week before a board meeting. Tracking and compliance feed this page. If those are not on the record, there is nothing honest to report.
- Documents stored with the grant
- Funder-specific report generation
- Compliance documents on the same record
- Numbers drawn from outcomes, scores, and dates already entered
Who it is for
For foundations that owe a packet and are tired of rebuilding it.
Staff who currently export, retype, and hope the totals match. Board packets, funder-specific reports, and closeout documents, on the funder side, about the awards you made.
It is not a grantee tool for reporting back to many funders. A report can only speak to what the record already holds. If those facts are still in email, start with grants management and grant tracking, not with a new export.
Before you write us
Other places the year breaks
Best grant management software
Most roundups assume an open call. What “best” means if you invite applicants and need the year on one record.
Grantmaker software
Funder-side software: the foundation that makes the award, not the nonprofit that received it.
GivingData alternative
For foundations that invite applicants and want the year on one record. Not a clone, not a login.
Blackbaud Grantmaking alternative
When the suite is larger than the year you run. Invitation-only grantmaker software, quoted, not a clone.
Foundant alternative
Not a login. For foundations that invite applicants and want the year on one record.
Grants management
The year lives in email, a drive, and a spreadsheet. A grants management system puts the program, the decision, and the report on one record.
Grant tracking
Tracking fails when it is a second system opened after the money went out. Watch outcomes and dates on the award itself.
Grant compliance
A compliance binder that drifts from the award letter cannot prove what happened. Requirements and completion stay on the file.
Nonprofit grant management
For foundations that invite the nonprofits they fund. Not software for a nonprofit tracking grants it received.
Grant review
Scores that live in a side form never make the board packet. Assignment, rubric, and decision stay on the grant.
Invitation-only grants
An open apply page fills the queue with people you did not choose. You invite who applies.
If this is the stall you have, write us.
Tell us how you run programs today. We will show you where Grantis holds the file.
