Grant compliance
Grant compliance software without a second binder.
Grant compliance software should not be a second binder. Set the outcomes and dates an awardee owes, then watch completion on the same record as the award.
The stall
Grant compliance software fails when it is a second system.
The program named outcomes. The award letter named dates. Then someone opened a new tracker and hoped the three would stay aligned.
A compliance binder that drifts from the award letter cannot prove what happened. Staff find out something is late from a calendar in a personal inbox, or from the week the board packet is due.
That is why people search for a grant compliance and tracking platform as if those were two products. In most tools, they are. The stall is the split.
The hold
Compliance is the program, after the money.
Grantis treats compliance as the award side of Foundation-Centered Program Management. The foundation sets required outcomes and due dates. Compliance and Outcome Tracking watches progress and completion. Reminders follow those dates through closeout.
When a funder or a board asks what happened, the answer should come from the file. The Document and Reporting Hub holds compliance documentation and can produce the report those dates and outcomes already describe. The health score includes compliance completion rates and reporting timeliness so a late cycle is not a surprise.
- Required outcomes set by the foundation
- Due dates on the award
- Progress and completion in one place
- Reminders through closeout
- Compliance documents stored with the grant
Who it is for
For foundations that set outcomes and then have to prove they were watched.
Staff who currently keep a compliance binder that drifts from the award letter. A foundation grant compliance platform in Grantis is not a separate product. It is the award side of the program you already run, with dates and completion on the record.
Restricted, unrestricted, or a mix: the software follows what you named on the program. If you came here from grant tracking or grant reporting, those pages cover the neighboring work. Compliance is the requirement layer those two rest on.
Before you write us
Other places the year breaks
Best grant management software
Most roundups assume an open call. What “best” means if you invite applicants and need the year on one record.
Grantmaker software
Funder-side software: the foundation that makes the award, not the nonprofit that received it.
GivingData alternative
For foundations that invite applicants and want the year on one record. Not a clone, not a login.
Blackbaud Grantmaking alternative
When the suite is larger than the year you run. Invitation-only grantmaker software, quoted, not a clone.
Foundant alternative
Not a login. For foundations that invite applicants and want the year on one record.
Grants management
The year lives in email, a drive, and a spreadsheet. A grants management system puts the program, the decision, and the report on one record.
Grant tracking
Tracking fails when it is a second system opened after the money went out. Watch outcomes and dates on the award itself.
Grant reporting
Export, retype, hope the totals match. Packets should come from the file you already keep, not a second year of work.
Nonprofit grant management
For foundations that invite the nonprofits they fund. Not software for a nonprofit tracking grants it received.
Grant review
Scores that live in a side form never make the board packet. Assignment, rubric, and decision stay on the grant.
Invitation-only grants
An open apply page fills the queue with people you did not choose. You invite who applies.
If this is the stall you have, write us.
Tell us how you run programs today. We will show you where Grantis holds the file.
